Gusto vs Paylocity: How Does Sunrise HCM Compare?

You probably didn't start this search because payroll is broken. You started it because Gusto is starting to feel small for where the company is headed, or because Paylocity showed up on a shortlist and the price tag is a mystery until someone gets on a call. Gusto vs Paylocity is really a question about company size and how much HR infrastructure you actually need. Here's how the two compare, and where Sunrise HCM fits into the decision.

Gusto vs Paylocity vs Sunrise HCM at a Glance

The short version, before the details.

What is Gusto?

Gusto launched in 2011 as ZenPayroll, built around one idea: payroll simple enough that a business owner without an HR background could run it without help. It rebranded a few years later and has stayed focused on that same audience since. Employee payroll is U.S.-only, though contractor payments work across 120+ countries, and the platform is built for teams under about 150 employees.

Key Features

Full-service payroll runs across all 50 states with automatic direct deposit and tax filings. Benefits enrollment covers health insurance, 401(k), HSA and FSA, commuter benefits, and workers' compensation. PTO tracking is built into every tier. Pricing is published up front: Simple at $49 a month plus $6 per employee, Plus at $80 a month plus $12 per employee, and Premium at $180 a month plus $22 per employee.

Where Gusto Works Well

Setup is fast enough that most small teams run their first payroll within a week. Non-technical owners routinely describe running payroll without reading documentation, and compliance alerts arrive before deadlines rather than after. For very small teams, Gusto wins on price, speed, and simplicity almost by default.

Where Gusto Runs Into Trouble

The limitations show up the moment a business needs more than core payroll and benefits. There's no dedicated talent management suite: no formal recruiting pipeline, no compensation planning tools, no learning management system. Reporting stays basic. Teams that outgrow that scope often start comparing Gusto vs Paycom or Gusto vs Rippling as the next step up.

What is Paylocity?

Paylocity has been around since 1997 and built its reputation on a single-database HCM platform aimed at mid-market companies, typically those with 50 to 1,000-plus employees, though smaller tech-forward teams and larger enterprises use it too. The pitch is different from Gusto's: instead of payroll with some HR bolted on, Paylocity treats payroll as one module inside a full employee lifecycle system.

Key Features

Payroll includes tax filing, garnishment services, expense management, and on-demand pay options. The talent suite covers recruiting and applicant tracking, onboarding, performance management, compensation planning, and a learning management system, all built to work off the same employee record. Paylocity Community, a social and engagement layer, is a genuine differentiator: few competitors at this price point bundle culture and recognition tools directly into the HCM platform. Integrations run through the Paylocity Marketplace and an open API.

Costs and Considerations

Paylocity doesn't publish pricing. Quotes vary by company size and module selection, and third-party estimates put the full HCM suite around $26 to $33 per employee per month, often with an implementation fee layered on top. That opacity is the most common complaint buyers raise: you'll need a sales call before you know what you're actually paying. Day-to-day gripes cluster around two things, PTO tracking that takes more steps than it should and a standard report library you have to learn before it gives up the numbers you want.

Gusto vs Paylocity: Side-by-Side Comparison

Here's where the comparison gets specific, category by category.

Payroll Processing

Both platforms run reliable full-service payroll with automatic tax filing and direct deposit. Paylocity adds on-demand pay, garnishment services, and more configurable expense management, which matters once a company has employees who need pay advances or complex expense workflows. Gusto keeps it simpler: fewer moving parts, but also fewer levers to pull for a growing HR team.

Winner: Paylocity

More configurable for companies whose payroll needs have outgrown the basics.

HR and Talent Management

This is the category that actually separates the two products. Gusto handles core HR: onboarding checklists, document storage, PTO tracking. Paylocity runs a full talent lifecycle: recruiting and applicant tracking, structured performance reviews, compensation planning, and a learning management system, all tied to one employee record. For a company still hiring its first HR person, that gap barely registers. For one that's started thinking about succession planning or formal performance cycles, the Paylocity vs Gusto talent management gap is the whole ballgame.

Winner: Paylocity

The talent suite alone justifies the switch for companies past the "just payroll" stage.

Pricing and Cost Transparency

Gusto publishes its rates: Simple at $49 a month plus $6 per employee, Plus at $80 a month plus $12 per employee, Premium at $180 a month plus $22 per employee. Paylocity requires a sales conversation before any number appears, and the quote depends heavily on which modules get bundled in. Gusto wins on transparency here, no contest. Paylocity can still be reasonable per employee at scale; you just won't know that until you've had the call.

Winner: Gusto

Predictable, published pricing you can budget around before committing.

Employee Engagement and Culture Tools

Gusto has no dedicated engagement or culture layer beyond basic surveys on higher tiers. Paylocity Community brings social feeds, peer recognition, and engagement surveys directly into the platform employees already use for pay stubs and time off. That's not a close call: for companies wrestling with retention or trying to build culture across a distributed workforce, the built-in layer removes a separate tool from the stack entirely.

Winner: Paylocity

Community is a real product, not a checkbox add-on, and most competitors have nothing like it.

Customer Support

Gusto includes phone and chat support on every plan during business hours, with email as a fallback; Premium layers on priority routing and a dedicated advisor, which is also sold as an add-on for $30 a month plus $3 per person. Paylocity assigns a client-specific service team on its higher tiers, which tends to mean faster resolution once you're past a certain account size, though reviews on responsiveness are mixed for both platforms. Paylocity vs Gusto on support is really a question about access: Gusto gives every customer a phone number, Paylocity gives larger accounts a named team. Neither includes a dedicated relationship manager as standard on every plan the way some competitors do.

Winner: Tie

Gusto is stronger at the small end because support isn't gated behind a tier; Paylocity is stronger at the large end because a named service team beats a queue.

Implementation and Time to Value

Gusto is built for speed: most small teams are running payroll within days of signing up, with minimal configuration. Paylocity's onboarding takes longer, generally several weeks, because there's more to configure across payroll, benefits, and the talent modules. The tradeoff runs both ways: Gusto trades depth for speed, Paylocity trades speed for depth.

Winner: Gusto

Faster time to value, though at the cost of the features Paylocity includes from day one.

Integrations and Ecosystem

Gusto connects to the standard small-business stack: QuickBooks, Xero, and common HR and accounting tools via its API and app directory. Paylocity's Marketplace and open API cover a broader set of HR, benefits, and workforce management tools suited to mid-market environments. Neither integrates natively with Salesforce, which becomes relevant fast for professional services firms running client and project data through Salesforce time and expense tracking.

Winner: Paylocity

Broader ecosystem for companies with more complex tool stacks.

Reporting and Analytics

Gusto's reporting covers payroll history, tax filings, and standard HR reports, which is sufficient for most teams under 100 employees. Paylocity offers deeper workforce analytics befitting its talent management depth, though users note the standard report templates aren't always intuitive to navigate. Paylocity vs Gusto on reporting is a straight trade: Paylocity has more raw capability, Gusto is easier to actually use without training.

Winner: Paylocity

More depth available, with a learning curve attached.

Pros and Cons of Gusto vs Paylocity

Have You Considered Sunrise HCM as an Alternative to Gusto or Paylocity?

Choosing between the two usually comes down to a tradeoff: simplicity and price versus talent management depth. For professional services firms or any business running on Salesforce, that framing misses a third option worth adding to the shortlist.

Built Natively on Salesforce

Sunrise HCM runs inside Salesforce itself, with no separate license to buy or connector to maintain. For businesses already using Salesforce CRM, payroll and HR data live in the same environment as client accounts and project records. A Salesforce HRIS built on the platform your team already works in every day is a fundamentally different starting point than bolting an HCM system on from outside.

Payroll, HR, Time, and Billing in One System

Gusto covers payroll and benefits. Paylocity adds a full talent suite. Neither connects time tracking directly to client billing. Sunrise HCM does: Salesforce payroll software and Salesforce billing software run in the same system, so time entries flow straight into invoices instead of getting reconciled by hand at month's end. For firms that bill by the hour or the project, that connection is often worth more than either competitor's talent tools.

Pricing You Can Plan Around, With Support Included

Pricing is published: $16 per employee, $48 per manager, $58 per HR manager, plus a $58 base fee, with no per-payroll processing charges. Every plan includes a U.S.-based dedicated relationship manager as standard, not a premium add-on. Most companies are live in 2 to 4 weeks, with 6 to 8 weeks for the full implementation including two parallel payroll cycles to confirm accuracy before cutover, and Sunrise HCM is SOC 2 Type II compliant through the Salesforce platform. For companies stuck between Gusto's simplicity ceiling and Paylocity's opaque quote process, Sunrise HCM offers a published number and a person to call when something needs fixing.

Parting Thoughts on Gusto vs Paylocity

The Gusto vs Paylocity choice tracks company size more closely than most vendor comparisons. Under roughly 100 employees with straightforward payroll needs, Gusto is usually the right call: it's cheaper, faster to set up, and doesn't ask you to manage features you don't need yet. Once a company starts hiring formally, running performance cycles, or planning compensation structures, the Paylocity vs Gusto comparison tips the other way: Paylocity's talent suite starts to earn its higher, harder-to-pin-down price. Neither platform, though, connects payroll and HR to project billing the way professional services firms often need. If that's the gap in your evaluation, Sunrise HCM is worth a look before you sign with either one.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is better between Gusto and Paylocity?

Neither wins outright. The tiebreaker is almost always company size. Under about 100 employees, Gusto is the easier call: fast setup, published pricing, nothing extra to configure. Once a company starts formal recruiting, running real performance cycles, or planning compensation structures, Paylocity earns its higher price. Ask a 20-person company and a 200-person company which one is better and you'll get two different, equally correct answers.

What are the downsides of Paylocity?

You won't know what you're paying until someone gets on a call with you, and that's usually the first frustration buyers hit. Paylocity doesn't publish rates, so budgeting means sitting through a sales conversation before you can even compare it against anything else. Implementation also runs longer than SMB-focused tools like Gusto, since there's more to configure across payroll, benefits, and the talent modules. Two smaller complaints come up over and over: requesting and approving time off takes more clicks than it should, and pulling the right standard report means learning the template library first.

Who is Paylocity's biggest competitor?

Paycom, ADP Workforce Now, and UKG are the names that keep showing up on the same shortlist, since all three chase the same mid-market HR budget Paylocity does. If you've gotten this far into vendor research, Paycom vs Paylocity and ADP vs Paylocity are worth a read before you sit through another demo.

Why are businesses switching from Gusto or Paylocity to Sunrise HCM?

Usually it comes down to the gap between payroll and what the business actually bills clients for. Neither Gusto nor Paylocity ties time tracking to invoices, so professional services firms end up reconciling the two by hand every month. The other draw is simpler: a published price and a native Salesforce integration, instead of a connector to maintain or a quote to wait on.

Who should choose Sunrise HCM instead of Gusto or Paylocity?

Professional services firms, Salesforce shops, and anyone billing clients by time or project tend to fit best. Sunrise HCM keeps payroll, HR, time tracking, and billing in one Salesforce-native system, with pricing you can see up front and a dedicated relationship manager included on every plan instead of held back for a premium tier.

Does Paylocity work for small businesses, or is it overkill?

For most small businesses, it's overkill. The exception is a team growing fast enough to want talent management tools in place before it strictly needs them. For a genuinely small team that just needs payroll handled correctly, Paylocity's cost and setup effort usually outpace the job, which is why teams that size more often end up comparing Gusto vs BambooHR instead.

‍